Contemporary

What is the religion of Nehru-Gandhi family? – Muslim, Hindu or Anti-Hindu: Check these valid arguments

Sardar Vallabh Bhai once commented, “There’s only one nationalist Muslim in India: Jawaharlal Nehru.” As mentioned in the book – ‘Rewriting Indian History‘, by Francois Gautier. What is the religion of the Nehru-Gandhi family? – Muslim, Hindu or Anti-Hindu.

For the previous 10 years or so, this has become one of the most talked about the question that ‘What is the actual religion of Nehru-Gandhi Family?’, ‘Who was Gangadhar Nehru ?’, ‘Gangadhar Nehru and Gayasuddin Ghazi Khan were the same characters or not?’ and much more similar and related questions.

I am not here with any pre-judgemental thought for or against any side, but based on the facts and incidents, I would like to genuinely convey a point or two.

At first glance, the question arises, why the hell this question suddenly surfaced around 40-45 years after the death of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, and who was the person or organization which dropped this BOMBSHELL. Not only a Bombshell it was heartbreaking or an eye-opener for many, few believed that it was a part of the conspiracy to malign Nehru-Gandhi family.

So, who throw this piece of information?

  • Well, this news came after the evolution of the internet and social media, this was the period when social media helped news to spread to masses without any intervention from the state, which was controlled by state-run and traditional media until now. Every single individual can send any news or information to any of his/her contacts. This helped people to spread the information, which was suppressed until now.
  • Few sources claim that such hidden information was accessed by the person who is no more now, his name was Late Shri Rajiv Dixit, IIT alumni later joined Swadeshi Movement as an activist. He launched the Azadi Bachao Andolan (Save Freedom Movement) in the early 90s to protect Indian industries. He also served as the national secretary of Bharat Swabhiman Andolan.
  • Few sources claim that – The book “From Bharat to India: the rape of Chrysee” written by M.K. Agrawal says that Ganga Dhar Nehru’s real name was Ghiyasuddin Ghazi, you may read it here – page – 459 & 460.
  • The official page of Delhi Police, claims in its section – ‘History of Delhi’ that Delhi’s last kotwal’s name was Gangadhar, who was the father of Motilal Nehru. While M.K. Agarwal says in his book that – ” All previous kotwal had been Muslim and there is no trace of a Hindu Kowal in the official documents of that period.
  • It is also claimed that the origin of this information was a book named  “Encyclopaedia Of Indian War Of Independence (1857-1947)” by M.K.Singh, as per the information posted on Quora -” which also states that Ghiyasuddin Ghazi was the last Kotwal of Delhi and he changed his name to Gangadhar Nehru. This book has been reportedly mentioned as a reference for this fact.”

If this information is correct then probably the original source of this information lies with the –  “Encyclopaedia Of Indian War Of Independence (1857-1947)” by M.K.Singh, and M.K. Agarwal and Rajiv Dixit both probably referred to this information only.

 Book by M.K. singh

Though I have not read this book so couldn’t claim the correctness of this piece of information from M.K. Singh’s book

Abovementioned sources cannot be outrightly rejected or ignored.

There is no other known authentic source of information available as of now, by which this could be proved that – Nehru’s ancestors were Muslims/Mughals and because of fear of getting killed by Britishers, they changed their name to Hindu names and moved to Agra from Delhi and later continued with those names.

It is said that “one can hide the identity, but acts and deeds reflect the real character of an individual”, if we go by this, then Nehru-Gandhi family’s deeds may surely indicate something.

How do you see below-mentioned facts, which probably indicate something substantial – if seen by putting together the facts and by seeing the co-relation between them:-

1 . It seemed that Partition of India didn’t pain Nehru, but he was the happiest man after grabbing the power and becoming first Prime Minister of India and he was fine with United India divided into Two Muslim and one secular nation. Gandhi deeply pained by seeing broken India, initially Gandhi was resistant to divide the country but under influence of Nehru finally, he gave up and paved the way for Nehru’s desires.

2 . Nehru’s disturbing attitude (or anti-national attitude) towards Muslim-majority and Muslim ruled areas of divided India, which includes Kashmir, Jaunpur, and the State of Hyderabad.

  • He was neutral towards Islamic State Pakistan’s grabbing One of the most strategically critical parts of Kashmir – Gilgit/Baltistan, which touches China, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Central Asian countries. It was Sardar Patel who took the decision and remaining Kashmir. Even after that, Nehru made Sheikh Abdulla the Prime Minister of the newly created separate entity with many special provisions, which is the root of all problems till date.
  • Again it was Sardar Patel, who saved Junagarh, Hyderabad, Bhopal for India.

3 . His entire idea of secularism was more inclined towards anti-Hinduism than anything else.

4 . Nehru once said I am an Englishman by education, a Muslim by culture, and a Hindu merely by accident

5 . Nehru’s concept of the Uniform Civil Code was such that this will be applicable on Hindus and stated that – “Now we do not dare to touch the Muslims because they are a minority and we do not want the Hindu majority to do it. These are personal laws and so will remain for the Muslims until they want to change them. We do not wish to create the impression that we are forcing any particular thing in regard to Muslims’ personal laws.”

Self-proclaimed ‘Progressive’ Nehru did not see any problem with polygamy and triple talaq.

6 . When Indians were in pathetic condition because of post-independence multiple problems, Nehru brought Haj Committee act, 1959 that allowed Haj Subsidy when Muslim Pilgrims travel to a distant nation – Saudi Arabia with huge expenditure.

But at the same time, there was no subsidy for Hindus for Char Dham Yatra within the country, which constitutes 85% of the population.

7 . Nehru tried to destroy the Sanatan Hindu Dharma by its roots:

As mentioned on this Blogspot website – As per Gurudev Dr. Kateswami in Weekly Sanatan Chintan, 23rd August 2007, Issue 27 –

“Nehru deserves to be punished in hell till the end of Kaliyuga for his great sin of destroying manuscripts, scriptures, and books that depicted Hindu progress and affluence!”

This is being referred to the JNU in the line of Oxford & Harvard Universities, and in the course of formation of JNU

He appealed to the people to send in all the ancient manuscripts, scriptures and books in their possession. Accordingly, the University received a large treasure of these. Nehru destroyed all manuscripts, scriptures that depicted progress and opulence of Hindus.”

8 . Education is of the top priority for any government, specifically for the country which just became independent after around 200 years of foreign rule. To lay a strong foundation to build the future of coming generations, it is very important that how education policy framed, how history and culture books to be written and to chose the right person whom this responsibility should be given.

  • Glorious Indian ancient past was distorted, Mughal era over-glorified, Hindu gods were declared as fictitious characters.
  • Extreme leftist and anti-Hindu writers were chosen to write the key important books. Those writers/authors include –
    • Romila Thapar (She is an advocate of whitewashing the cruelty, horrors of Islamic invasions and the Mughal rule in India| She tried to downplay the achievements of the great Indian kingdoms as they hurt her disgust for anything that can give rise to national pride in Indians. She wants to de-emphasize such portions of history in the name of opposing Hindutva), It is well known that Romila Thapar is a relative of Nehru and journalist – Karan Thapar.
    • Irfan Habib – Irfan Habib’s father was another Nehruvian, Marxist historian and both father and son are AMU alumni.
    • Similarly, RS Sharma, DN Jha are unabashedly harsh towards ancient Indian Hindu past, and had left no stone unturned in their scathing review of the ancient Hindu society, and did their best to whitewash the Medieval Invasions.
    • Also, India’s contribution to the world civilization and culture was intentionally left-out and weakened, even Eminent Historians tried to impose the thought that we Indians have borrowed certain things from Islamic/Mesopotamian/Sumer/Egypt/Roman/Greek civilizations. P.N. Oak pointed on such facts which influenced the contemporary world over the course of history-

9 . The biggest harm Nehru did to Hindu in India, was to propose a Socialist, Secular approach and mask this ideological aspect. God knows if Nehru was really a Muslim, then this should have been the best policy to do anti-Hindu, pro-Islamic acts in the name of secularism and cover-up his Islamic character.

This image shows the condition of Hindu’s in India as a third-grade citizen, after the seventy-year rule of Nehru-Gandhi family:-

10 .  In most prominent part of Delhi or Lutyens Delhi, we have all these high profile roads named after Muslim dynasty rulers, who all were responsible for the very high order of cruelty, forced conversion, everywhere destroying the Hindu/Jain/Buddhist religious places. Prominent roads are named after Aurangzeb, Babar, Humayun, Akbar, Shajhan, Lodhi, and Tuglak Road. Less important roads are named rarely after other Hindu rulers.

While naming the landmarks, legendary Indian figures have been overlooked.

Rarely you might have seen the roads in the name of Chandragupta, Vikramaditya, Krishnadev Rai, Maharana Pratap, Hemu, Rana Sanga, Porus,  and other prominent Ancient Indian historical figures.

Out of these roads, few have been changed recently by NDA government led by Narendra Modi.

11 .  Beef Eater Family:  Nehru was a Beef-eater, as claimed by Rajiv Dixit by referring to many authentic sources in his video.

Apart from Rajiv Dixit, there are some other sources also confirm this.

As we all know, that Hindus don’t eat meat due to religious reasons and certain belief system.

  • There was another Book by M.O. Mathai,  One of the most explosive and authentic books on Nehru/Gandhi Family and post-independence Indian history. M.O. Mathai knew much about Nehru, Indira and many other politicians, which he stated in the book and due to this reason, the book was immediately banned.

( Read about banned books in India)

As claimed on many websites, many things about Indira’s secret love life, something related to that was written in this book. It is said that the article was originally supposed to be a part of Mathai’s book, ‘Reminiscences of the Nehru Age’ but for obvious reasons, at the last moment, it was left out of the book and never published.

M.O. Mathai (1909–1981) was the Private Secretary to India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru.

Very sensitive & extremely interesting topic  ‘She’ of this book, which narrates the secret love/sex relationship between Mathai & Indira. The transcript of  “she” chapter is available on the internet, just google it.

In this so-called left-out part ‘she’, Mathai mentioned the India Gandhi’s love for Veal (Meat of young calf), a kind of beef. He also mentioned that Indira not even read Ramayana and Mahabharata ever. Mathai also mentioned in that left-out book that once Indira said that “she would not like to get married to a Hindu man”.

This book is available as a free download here.

Here is the PDF download of the book1 & 2 .

Available at: Amazon.com (US/Global)

Apart from Mathai mentioning Indira’s love affair with him, another writer – Katherine Frank also mentioned their affair in the book “The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi”.

12 .  Indira Gandhi’s Babar’s Grave visit Incident:

It’s been reported by the former diplomat, congressman, and Union minister Mr. Natwar Singh in his memoirs, that during an official visit to Afghanistan along with then PM Indira Gandhi in 1968, he accompanied her as an IFS officer in duty, he states in his book that – after having completed the day’s long engagements, Indira Gandhi wanted to go out for a ride in the evening. After going a long distance in the car, Indira Gandhi wanted to visit Babur’s burial place located there, though this was not included in the itinerary. The Afghan security officials tried to dissuade her, but she was adamant. In the end, she went to that burial place. It was a deserted place. She went before Babur’s grave, stood there for a few minutes with head bent down in reverence. Natwar Singh stood behind her. When Indira had finished her prayers, she turned back and told Singh “Today we have had our brush with history”. It is worth noting here that Babur was the founder of the Mughal Dynasty in India, probably she was referring to History as from Babur only Nehru-Gandhi dynasty have descended.

Another point should also be noted here that, in Afghanistan, there is another very important grave located from the Indian perspective, this is of the famous Hindu king – Prithvi Raj Chauhan. Being Indian, Indira Gandhi should have visited Prithvi Raj Chauhan’s gave first, but there was something special in Babar, which made sense for her to take time out from her extremely busy schedule and paid an unofficial visit at Babur’s burial place and pray with head bent down. It is self-explanatory, isn’t it! 

This was a huge incident captured by Natwar Singh in his book, there is no doubt about its authenticity.

13 . Rajiv Gandhi’s public confession, that he is not Hindu:

Rajiv Gandhi knowingly or unknowingly did it thrice, it seemed quite natural and spontaneous reaction from him. Twice he said it clearly with the direct meaning and once it was implied.

Directly and clearly:

  • After taking over Prime Ministership of India, when Rajiv Gandhi visited London, during a press-conference, He clearly said that he is not Hindu, but a Parsi. However, Rajiv Gandhi’s father was not a Parsi but a Muslim, as Feroze Khan’s father and Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal grandfather Nawab Khan was a Muslim from the Junagarh, who had married with a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam.
  • 2nd incident happened when Rajiv Gandhi visited Kashmir in the late 80’s, during this visit to the valley. When he was standing with Farooq Abdulla during a function, suddenly Farooq in his dramatic style held Rajiv’s hand tight in his hand and lifted hand to exhibit commitment: “Aaj eak Musalman eak Hindu key saath muhadha kerta hai (Today a Musalman and a Hindu do commit to each other.” Naming Rajiv as Hindu was nothing short of an electric current to Rajiv. He in a jolt withdrew his hand and said: “Maie kehan Hindu houn (How come I am a Hindu?)” Farooq said: “Thodee dhair key leiay maan lo na. (Let it be for a while)”. Check it out the complete incident.
  • 3rd incident seemed to be implied one. On 15th August 1988, a couple of lines from his speech from the Red Fort says: “Our endeavor should be to take the country to heights to which it belonged about 250-300 years ago.” It indicates the period of Aurangzeb or his predecessors, It indicates his mindset, which sees the things from Mughal dynasty perspective.

For him, the maximum glory was witnessed by the country during the Mughal era, of course, for him the Mughal’s acts of temple destroying, the murder of masses, hundreds of thousands forced conversions seemed to be fine.

If you find this article meaningful then it is expected from you to spread this to your surrounding as an eye-opner informative aticle, and if you think any correction is required – please share your feedback in comment box.

If you have came across any other valuable data on this matter, do let us know.

Hope you have got the message.

Facts & Acts don’t lie!

So if someone is trying to make a fool of you, thinking that you are a seasoned fool veteran, It does prove one thing for sure, that insatiable greed for power has raised the bar of shamelessness and immoral acts so high, that even the Himalayas seem to be a small rock in their comparison.

One should feel proud by naming his true religion, whatever it is.

One must remember that – You can not fool people, forever!

You may also read:

Advertisements